<d...@gnu.org> wrote Friday, May 04, 2012 8:43 PM
Ok, everybody will love me for my late thinking again. But here we go:
:)
we have two cases of footnotes: one that will attach itself to whatever
happens at a given point of time, being an independent event.
I propose we _always_ let
them try to attach themselves as postevents/articulations, by defining
the footnote command with define-event-function. Then the - before the
footnote call is optional, like it is with things like \p.
I think that makes more sense to explain.
Definitely!
Yes, it is a nuisance to
rewrite the documentation _again_,
Sorry James, but I agree with David - any simplification is well worth it.
@David: will you action the change?
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
