On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:03:36 -0800, Jay Anderson <horndud...@gmail.com> wrote:
I agree with Werner that this is a bug, but with the override it's low priority (it may be worth documenting however).
I entered it as issue 2264. The algorithm looks like dynamic programming, which should be linear-time in the number of measures, unless the paths of potential breaks aren't getting pruned correctly. I suspect that some array gets too big to fit in cache. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
