----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca>
To: "Janek Warchoł" <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com>
Cc: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>; "lilypond-user" <lilypond-u...@gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 11:57 AM
Subject: user vs. user (was: User vs Developer: Round 2 (and
half-time?)(was: Re: music font)
Let's take a look at the current statistics, shall we?
http://lilypond.org/~graham/maybe-missing-emails.html
[from 2011 Dec 01 to 2012 Jan 24]
Response category Number Percent of total
Less than 24 hours 50 68.49%
24 to 48 hours 6 8.22%
More than 48 hours 8 10.96%
Never replied 9 12.33%
FWIW, the script isn't always correct - some replies seem to get missed in
the mail download. I spent a few minutes looking at this earlier but
couldn't work out why. Anyway, let's look at the "missed" ones:
Issue 1377 should be pushed now?
10 Dec I replied "I see James has now said it won't patch master, and so
is back to "needs work""
Beam subdivision bug in 2.15.22
Xavier replied same day, Carl followed up.
hot potato bug handling
I replied 18 Dec
error: auto beaming in tuplets after dotted semiquaver
Carl replied same day
Engravers cannot be added at the StaffGroup level
Janek replied same day
PianoStaff, time and grace duplicates the time display
Xavier replied same day
Reorganize NR 1.3 Expressive marks
Fair cop - it was addressed directly to James, though
make doc-stage-1 barfs
Julien replied same day.
wrong beamlet direction in 6/8 and 3/4 measure for dotted quaver and
semiquavers
Janek replied same day; Carl followed up.
We may need to add Janek and Xavier to the list of associates.
Of course, a 96-hour reponse rate isn't precisely fantastic, but it's a
start.
Well - TBH time isn't of the essence as a general rule. Whether a bug gets
added to the tracker in one day or 3 rarely affects the overall development.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
