Hi David,
On 02/01/12 21:33, d...@gnu.org wrote:
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5464045/diff/10002/ly/music-functions-init.ly
>
> 
File ly/music-functions-init.ly (right):
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5464045/diff/10002/ly/music-functions-init.ly#newcode31
>
>  ly/music-functions-init.ly:31: %% need (scm
> markup-facility-defs)for markup? On 2012/01/02 21:19:24, Ian Hulin
> (gmail) wrote:
>> On 2012/01/02 14:04:39, dak wrote:
>>> Wasn't this supposed to get removed?  This was not supposed to
>>> be
> needed in
>>> user-level docs, right?
>> No.  This isn't a user-level document, it's part of the run-time
> initialization
>> we do for each user document.
> 
> Argl.  I just don't get along with Rietveld: I thought this was 
> input/regression/bookparts.ly.
> 
Don't worry, input/regression/bookparts.ly has gone from the patch
entirely.  A new stream-lined set of files has been uploaded.

They pass the reg-tests locally.

New patch-set is at http://codereview.appspot.com/5504107.

Cheers,

Ian

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to