Hi David, On 02/01/12 21:33, d...@gnu.org wrote: > > http://codereview.appspot.com/5464045/diff/10002/ly/music-functions-init.ly > > File ly/music-functions-init.ly (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/5464045/diff/10002/ly/music-functions-init.ly#newcode31 > > ly/music-functions-init.ly:31: %% need (scm > markup-facility-defs)for markup? On 2012/01/02 21:19:24, Ian Hulin > (gmail) wrote: >> On 2012/01/02 14:04:39, dak wrote: >>> Wasn't this supposed to get removed? This was not supposed to >>> be > needed in >>> user-level docs, right? >> No. This isn't a user-level document, it's part of the run-time > initialization >> we do for each user document. > > Argl. I just don't get along with Rietveld: I thought this was > input/regression/bookparts.ly. > Don't worry, input/regression/bookparts.ly has gone from the patch entirely. A new stream-lined set of files has been uploaded.
They pass the reg-tests locally. New patch-set is at http://codereview.appspot.com/5504107. Cheers, Ian _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
