"m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> writes: > I now see what the problem is. I had updated the version number all > the snippets that needed updating, but all of the offending snippets > are in the .tely files. The \version statement for these snippets is > not in the snippets themselves (I thought they were versionless when I > updated them) but rather at the top of the .tely files. > > A few things: > > 1) If someone could please update 10.9.5 to talk about how versioning > works in the .tely files, that would help a lot.
I have no clue whatsoever. But of course, the litmus test for whether you are finished is that scripts/auxiliar/update-with-convert-ly does not change files anymore. > 2) A reminder in 10.9.5 to change versions when moving stuff to > Documents/snippets/new would be great too. I am not sure whether that is not something Graham wants to do himself. However, I think it is harmless enough to do it on his behalf _in_ dev/staging, as a separate commit "bump version number" after the commits containing the convert-ly rule and the result of applying it, respectively. It means that other developers can add new syntax rules _in_ dev/staging without waiting for Graham. If Graham decides to flush somebody's contribution from dev/staging while keeping the rest, the worst that will happen is that a version number gets skipped. And of course, the flushed parts have to be resubmitted with changed version numbers in addition to any other changes Graham requests. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
