"m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> writes: > 3) When patches come out and are on review, especially when the > patches go through the review cycle more than once, it'd be great if > this sort of thing were addressed. Originally I didn't add convert-ly > rules because I wasn't 100% sure on the syntax and wanted to wait till > bugs were out and until syntax was stable before adding them. I now > realize this is a bad idea. I am not saying that anyone else could > have spotted at the outset how bad this idea was nor that this is > anyone's responsibility but my own. What I'm saying is that, if you > notice an omission in your review, please don't hesitate to speak up.
My strategy is to pout and howl up a storm once it is too late. I don't claim it to be optimal. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel