"m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> writes:

> 3) When patches come out and are on review, especially when the
> patches go through the review cycle more than once, it'd be great if
> this sort of thing were addressed.  Originally I didn't add convert-ly
> rules because I wasn't 100% sure on the syntax and wanted to wait till
> bugs were out and until syntax was stable before adding them.  I now
> realize this is a bad idea.  I am not saying that anyone else could
> have spotted at the outset how bad this idea was nor that this is
> anyone's responsibility but my own.  What I'm saying is that, if you
> notice an omission in your review, please don't hesitate to speak up.

My strategy is to pout and howl up a storm once it is too late.  I don't
claim it to be optimal.

-- 
David Kastrup


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to