On Aug 22, 2011, at 12:06 PM, reinhold.kainho...@gmail.com wrote:

> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/input/regression/color.ly
> File input/regression/color.ly (right):
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/input/regression/color.ly#newcode24
> input/regression/color.ly:24: \override Flag #'color = #blue
> Why don't you choose a different color to check that the two grobs are
> really handled differently?
> 

Done.

> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/lily/flag.cc
> File lily/flag.cc (right):
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/lily/flag.cc#newcode54
> lily/flag.cc:54: '() or "grace").  */
> That comment should be moved down to stroke-style
> 

Done.

> http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/lily/flag.cc#newcode97
> lily/flag.cc:97: if (scm_is_string (stroke_style_scm))
> Sooner or later, that should be moved out from here into its own grob.
> Then we can also have slashed beamed grace notes (which don't have any
> flag).

Agreed.

> http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/lily/tie-formatting-problem.cc
> File lily/tie-formatting-problem.cc (right):
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/lily/tie-formatting-problem.cc#newcode177
> lily/tie-formatting-problem.cc:177: boxes.push_back (Box (flag->extent
> (x_refpoint_, X_AXIS), flag->extent (commony, Y_AXIS)));
> Line too long
> 

Fixed.

> http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/ly/engraver-init.ly#newcode787
> ly/engraver-init.ly:787: \override Flag #'flag-style = #'no-flag
> Do we need/want a convert-ly warning for \override Stem #'flag-style?
> 

Yes - I'd put this in a separate patch/issue (unless people think it belongs 
here - it seems that convert-ly rules usually come after patches get pushed).

> http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/scm/define-grob-properties.scm
> File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right):
> 
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/scm/define-grob-properties.scm#newcode276
> scm/define-grob-properties.scm:276: (flag-style ,symbol? "A symbol
> determining what style of flag
> rename to style? Unfortunately, then we don't have any documentation any
> more about the valid values... :(

You've hit the proverbial nail on its proverbial head.  It is for this reason 
that I'm wary about renaming.

New patchset up, and thanks for your comments!

Cheers,
MS

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to