On Aug 22, 2011, at 12:06 PM, reinhold.kainho...@gmail.com wrote: > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/input/regression/color.ly > File input/regression/color.ly (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/input/regression/color.ly#newcode24 > input/regression/color.ly:24: \override Flag #'color = #blue > Why don't you choose a different color to check that the two grobs are > really handled differently? >
Done. > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/lily/flag.cc > File lily/flag.cc (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/lily/flag.cc#newcode54 > lily/flag.cc:54: '() or "grace"). */ > That comment should be moved down to stroke-style > Done. > http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/lily/flag.cc#newcode97 > lily/flag.cc:97: if (scm_is_string (stroke_style_scm)) > Sooner or later, that should be moved out from here into its own grob. > Then we can also have slashed beamed grace notes (which don't have any > flag). Agreed. > http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/lily/tie-formatting-problem.cc > File lily/tie-formatting-problem.cc (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/lily/tie-formatting-problem.cc#newcode177 > lily/tie-formatting-problem.cc:177: boxes.push_back (Box (flag->extent > (x_refpoint_, X_AXIS), flag->extent (commony, Y_AXIS))); > Line too long > Fixed. > http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/ly/engraver-init.ly#newcode787 > ly/engraver-init.ly:787: \override Flag #'flag-style = #'no-flag > Do we need/want a convert-ly warning for \override Stem #'flag-style? > Yes - I'd put this in a separate patch/issue (unless people think it belongs here - it seems that convert-ly rules usually come after patches get pushed). > http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/scm/define-grob-properties.scm > File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/1/scm/define-grob-properties.scm#newcode276 > scm/define-grob-properties.scm:276: (flag-style ,symbol? "A symbol > determining what style of flag > rename to style? Unfortunately, then we don't have any documentation any > more about the valid values... :( You've hit the proverbial nail on its proverbial head. It is for this reason that I'm wary about renaming. New patchset up, and thanks for your comments! Cheers, MS
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel