Graham Percival <graham <at> percival-music.ca> writes: > Type-critical: > You might want to split this into two: regressions to the output of Lilypond, and critical impediments to development
> * Type-ignorance: (fixme name?) it is not clear what the > correct output should look like. In a classification of Types, I'd drop this. It is not a type of problem but rather a status of problem, and not something we will likely want to sort under. We can look in the comments to see if the desired behavior is clear before starting to program. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
