On 8/10/11 10:46 AM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
> I'm feeling pretty good about this one, with the exception of
> whether we should have a Type-ignorance or not.
>
> In case you're wondering: yes, I am serious proposing that we
> elminiate priorities completely, and this is not a joke. Nobody
> has objected yet, but if you don't think this is a good idea,
> please speak up.
>
>
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_8.html
>
> ** Proposal summary
>
> Let¹s get rid of priorities. We will simply describe bugs in
> neutral terms; each contributor can search and interpret the
> results as he or she sees fit.
>
> We will make a ³Type-Critical²; a new stable release will only
> occur if there are 0 type-Critical issues.
It might be less work to only have 2 priorities:
Critical
Ordinary
Then we could continue to use the system as it exists now.
But I don't feel strongly enough about it to prevent prop 8 from passing.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
