Hi Anthony, When we discussed this last year, I argued that it shouldn't be part of the Chord_name_engraver. I still think this approach is misguided since we already have a convenient way of generating chord name markup via the formatter function.
If you check the archives, you'll see a proof-of-concept patch I posted which shows how easy it would be to implement this enhancement in scheme via the existing chord name formatting code. Cheers, Neil http://codereview.appspot.com/4626094/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
