On 5/23/11 2:53 PM, "Keith OHara" <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote:
> mike <at> apollinemike.com <mike <at> apollinemike.com> writes:
>>
>>
>> Just a question - are we comfortable making a release even though issue 1648
> isn't resolved?
An development release, not a stable release.
We make new releases periodically. If there are no Critical issues, then
the development release is a stable release candidate.
>>
>
> I think it would be fine to leave issue 1648 open for version 2.13.62. I am
> rather expecting someone to argue that issue 1648 is not critical, because the
> work-around to restore 2.12.3 behavior is so easy.
>
> Another technical MIDI regression just came up today, and it is not fixed in
> git.
>
> On the the main point of the thread, though, I believe 2.13.61 was built from
> stable/2.14 and that all the releases leading up to 2.14 will be built from
> there. Correct?
Yes, that's correct.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
