On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 04:43:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > > > As far as I know, we have master as the current development snapshot.
Yes. > > We have stable/2.14 as the 2.14 candidate; patches are cherry-picked from > > master to stable/2.14. Yes. Expect a release tomorrow. > > I don't think anything is officially happening with release/unstable and > > release/2.14 release/unstable is not used at the moment. I have no clue what release/2.14 is, but I'll look into it. I probably just pushed a branch like that instead of stable/2.14. Or maybe we should rename release/2.14 to stable/2.14 > Well, perhaps I have been confused by the amount of stuff cherry-picked > into stable/2.14 (the source of the cherry-picks gets lost in the branch > graph), combined with a slowdown of development in master. That makes > it appear like a lot more is happening in stable/2.14 when in fact it is > merely catching up with previous developments in master. This is understandable. You are quite correct in the final thought that stable/2.14 is merely catching up to (selected portions of) master. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
