both solutions eliminate dynamics and articulations on all notes!
Have you try something like that :
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
deleteFingering = #(define-music-function (parser location music)
(ly:music?)
(music-filter
(lambda (evt)
(not (memq (ly:music-property evt 'name) (list 'FingeringEvent))))
music))
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
then
\makeOctaves #1 \deleteFingering \music
It seems to only delete fingering events.
finally i'd like to qualify the importance: in any case one will have to
reedit the new lilypond notes to add the fingerings manually, an automated
calculation of those being unfeasible.
Yes, because a construct with \skip in a chord is not allowed.
Something like that is not possible :
<<
{ <c c'>4 }
{ <s-3 s-5>4 }
It can be a feature but i think it is as fast to reedit the new notes.
Gilles
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
