Gilles THIBAULT wrote: > >>is it possible to only copy notes, i.e. >>pitches and durations, excluding Fingering, stroke fingers and string >>numbers? > > 2 solutions : > > 1- You filter the music. Here is an example of filtered music > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > deleteDynamics = #(define-music-function (parser location music) > (ly:music?) > (music-filter > (lambda (evt) > (not (memq (ly:music-property evt 'name) (list > 'AbsoluteDynamicEvent > 'CrescendoEvent > 'DecrescendoEvent)))) > music)) > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > > You just have to know the scheme name of the events you don't want. > > 2- In the "octavize.ly" > line : 15 > Replace (append notes transposed-notes not-notes) > by (append notes transposed-notes) > line 44-45 : > Replace (append new-notes transposed-notes not-notes) > by (append new-notes transposed-notes) > thanks but sorry if i was not quite specific: i meant the octavized notes should not automatically get the same fingerings (and other attributes) as the original notes - but the fingerings of the original notes should be kept!
both solutions eliminate dynamics and articulations on all notes! i tried to implement the filter you gave right after the definition of transposed-notes in makeOctaves but i get only errors or no effect... then there is another problem: fingerings for single notes are a sub-class of articulations while in chords they are directly applicable - imo they should be moved to the note they belong to, which is inside the chord! finally i'd like to qualify the importance: in any case one will have to reedit the new lilypond notes to add the fingerings manually, an automated calculation of those being unfeasible. Eluze -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/improvement%28s%29-on-LSR-445-tp31239262p31321537.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
