2011/3/27 Francisco Vila <paconet....@gmail.com> > > 2011/3/26 Janek Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com>: > > W dniu 26 marca 2011 23:34 użytkownik Carl Sorensen > > <c_soren...@byu.edu> napisał: > >> > >> On 3/26/11 4:21 PM, "Francisco Vila" <paconet....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > 2011/3/26 Janek Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com>: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> i found something strange in mf/GNUmakefile. > >> >> lines 98-101 read: > >> >> $(outdir)/feta20.otf-table: $(outdir)/feta20.lisp \ > >> >> $(outdir)/feta-noteheads23.lisp \ > >> >> $(outdir)/parmesan20.lisp \ > >> >> $(outdir)/feta-alphabet20.lisp > >> >> > >> >> is "feta-noteheads23.lisp" intentional or should it be > >> >> "feta-noteheads20.lisp"? > >> > > >> > Udoubtedly, by looking at the context. This very line was introduced > >> > by Carl a year ago in 6aa85858a5 > >> > >> And fixed right now. > > > > Out of curiosity: what did this mistake mean for the lilypond output? > > Did it mean that staves of size 20 got noteheads of size 23 (it didn't > > look like that imo...)? > > No, it's a rule in the makefile and just stands for dependencies in > the build process. A wrong dependency rule could make a > compile-needing file not being detected as such, for example.
Aha! Thanks, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
