2011/3/26 Janek Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com>: > W dniu 26 marca 2011 23:34 użytkownik Carl Sorensen > <c_soren...@byu.edu> napisał: >> >> On 3/26/11 4:21 PM, "Francisco Vila" <paconet....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > 2011/3/26 Janek Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com>: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> i found something strange in mf/GNUmakefile. >> >> lines 98-101 read: >> >> $(outdir)/feta20.otf-table: $(outdir)/feta20.lisp \ >> >> $(outdir)/feta-noteheads23.lisp \ >> >> $(outdir)/parmesan20.lisp \ >> >> $(outdir)/feta-alphabet20.lisp >> >> >> >> is "feta-noteheads23.lisp" intentional or should it be >> >> "feta-noteheads20.lisp"? >> > >> > Udoubtedly, by looking at the context. This very line was introduced >> > by Carl a year ago in 6aa85858a5 >> >> And fixed right now. > > Out of curiosity: what did this mistake mean for the lilypond output? > Did it mean that staves of size 20 got noteheads of size 23 (it didn't > look like that imo...)?
No, it's a rule in the makefile and just stands for dependencies in the build process. A wrong dependency rule could make a compile-needing file not being detected as such, for example. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
