"Keith OHara" <k-ohara5...@oco.net> writes: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:35:16 -0800, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Ok, pushed. Something much like the previous output can still >> be selected, just like the voice->channel mapping for reproducing >> voice and staff mapping with the current midi2ly. >> > > It generally works. > > The MIDI port assignments are still being written to the output file; > I don't know if that is intended. > > I see you encode dynamics as MIDI note-on-velocity. (This is much > better than the old way of encoding dynamics as MIDI volume!)
Since not all instruments are percussive (like a piano is), it would make sense to also (optionally?) encode dynamic changes during note duration as "expression" signals. Otherwise a crescendo on sustained notes (like a string instrument or a wind instrument or an accordion can deliver) will not happen. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
