2011/3/9 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > On 3/8/11, Janek Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com> wrote: >> i don't see any discussion going on here, so i assume you agree to >> shortening the 32nd unbeamed stem. >> I attach the patch. > > IMO, there are two steps to this type of change: > > 1. discuss the aesthetics (or "beautiful notation"). That discussion > seems to be over. > > 2. discuss the technical patch. That discussion may or may not be > over, but I haven't seen it "officially" start. > > Could you upload this patch to rietveld? Once that's done, if the > patch passes the "obvious" checks, I'll include it in a 48-hour patch > countdown.
Done. http://codereview.appspot.com/4243071/ > Sorry for the extra caution, but I'm not going to push changes to the > fonts on my own authority. I want to give plenty of time for people > familiar with the topic to object, once it's clear that we have a > precise patch on the table rather than a general discussion.. No problem. I thought this patch is so simple (it's only changing one number in define-grobs.scm) that it doesn't need discussing. However, i forgot to modify downstem 32nd flag - it should be a bit shorter too. I'll fix this right now. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
