On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:43 AM, <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote: > I advise against changing the internal representation of pitches.
I am rather skeptic against patches that would want to do this, but from a casual glance, it looks thorough at least, and I understand that the current system is too limited still. What makes me uncomfortable that this looks like a non-backward compatible change. Why not use a sequence of Rationals (rather than ints) to represent the alteration? You could maintain the current system in a backward compatible way (using 1/2 and 1/4 as the only element in the alteration sequence) or have a system with tuples: +1/2 for the first element and +1/4 for the second element. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
