"Keith OHara" <k-ohara5...@oco.net> writes: > In the end, I'm a physicist, and pitch is a scalar, so a > one-dimensional real-valued representation seems wisest to me.
Since "real-valued" means a fuzzy and undefined set of rational numbers with denominators of the form 2^k for which not even associative law holds, I strongly disagree. Rationals are fine. "real-valued" isn't. Things don't compare sensibly, things don't add up sensibly. Transposition would be gambling, as would be most other manipulations. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
