On 1/24/11, pkx1...@gmail.com <pkx1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No problem. What would be the best thing to do with this 'code' would > putting the 'patch' I have on the tracker issue, with explanation and > appropriate comments from this Rietveld thread, be the right thing if > only to save re-doing more work for anyone who'd like to tackle this?
Could do. I think that the main point of doing this would be to motivate somebody to look at the engraver stuff -- "hey, James did a fair amount of work on this and showed that he was serious; I'll tackle this new feature request instead of some other one". > Seems a waste to just close this inasmuch I as a lot of the grunt work > has been done; or maybe not - it wasn't a waste for me in terms of > learning though. One definite benefit would be if you wrote a few words about what you just did. Find somewhere in the CG programming chapter, or maybe even make your own @node @subsection or @subsubsection or something like that, and put down a few notes about what you just did. Once you actually know what you're doing, this kind of grunt work only takes a few minutes. The difficult thing is discovering *what* work to do, and that's what the CG is for. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
