You should consider using a proper logging framework with different logging levels.
Bert On 1/2/11, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 02:25:57AM -0500, David Santamauro wrote: >> >> On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 10:19:18 +0000 >> Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: >> >> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1074 >> > Patches appreciated. Unfortunately I doubt that anything will >> > happen unless you personally work on it, but it's "on the books". >> >> Question: Should the be_verbose_global variable control this? I'm not >> sure a new command line argument is really needed as long as it is >> agreed upon what verbose is and isn't. > >> I added a be_quiet_global in my sandbox but reading the thread makes me >> think that simplification is needed and not an expansion. > > Since we already have a be_verbose_global variable, I can't > imagine much serious objection to having a be_quiet_global. My > initial guess would be that we want three different types of > output: > - verbose > - normal > - quiet > > However, this is definitely outside my depth. > > Cheers, > - Graham > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel > _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
