What I'm trying to do is document a categorisation that makes the job of the
bug squad easier. Unless anyone says no, I'll ask for the changes proposed
to be made.
--
Phil Holmes
----- Original Message -----
From: "Valentin Villenave" <valen...@villenave.net>
To: "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca>
Cc: "Janek Warchoł" <lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com>; "lilypond-devel"
<lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: issue classification: priority guidelines
2010/12/15 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>:
In the mean time, go ahead and twiddle the definitions of
priorities (as long as you leave Critical alone). But be aware
that you're "rearranging deck chairs on the titanic".
ROTFL -- my point exactly :-)
Cheers,
V.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
