Hi, I've read Issue classification and i think it would be good to add one more guideline concerning priority: i believe that the priority should depend on how widespread the issue is. Even minor problems concernning some basic elements (that will probably happen many times in even a single score) should be more important than an ugly collision that came from a contrived example and is not likely to happen more often than once or twice in hundred scores, or is related to very specific and complex engraving situations. Do you agree?
cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
