On 11/30/10 1:04 AM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 06:37:08AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> What about option 0 -- try to coordinate the resources we currently have >> available on the critical issues? > > I would like that. I'm a bit surprised to see so many people > talking about branching a stable/2.14 -- I don't think that would > solve anything. I'm willing to try it as an experiment, but I > really doubt that having a separate branch would encourage more > people to spend more time on critical issues. > > Instead of doubles tennis, let's play volleyball. Let's all (or > at least, everybody other than Joe+Neil+John) works together on an > issue. Instead of one person hitting the ball back, let's have > multiple people stop the ball, set it up, and then send it back. OK, I'm up for a volleyball game. > However, I'm not sufficiently motivated to do it all by myself if > lots of other people are only working on new features or > discussing policy changes. If they're having fun, then I want to > have fun too. But if there's a solid core of people doing the > hard work of trying to fix critical issues, then I will absolutely > be part of that group. Me too. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
