On 10/22/10 12:20 PM, "Marc Hohl" <m...@hohlart.de> wrote:

> Am 20.10.2010 15:30, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
>>   
>>> The README also says that we shouldn't apply transformations to
>>> fills, but instead transform the path then fill the path.  The
>>> current varsegno transforms the penstroke, which I think is contrary
>>> to this instruction.
>>>     
>> Yep.  For this glyph it works accidentally.  Thanks for noticing, I've
>> missed it.
>>   
> Um - so what do  I have to do? Rewrite the glyph completely, as Carl
> suggested,
> with a proper outline, and unfill the loops? Or is there a easier way out?

varsegno is now fixed, with commit bd4bb4efdb7e3a3e7ff23dbf35a33efb9b296bbc.

Thanks,

Carl


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to