>> This is probably overkill. FontForge is quite good in doing this for
>> you, provided the intersections are well defined. `fill' is necessary
>> because you can't exactly control the direction of the outline by
>> using `penstroke'.
>
> But if I change from penstroke to fill, using zkr to go along one
> side of the penstroke, then zkl to go back along the other side of
> the penstroke, and controlling the directions at each of the points
> on the glyph, I still get the same grazing intersections as showed
> up in the glyph using penstroke.
OK. I've just played a bit, and `fill' is indeed not necessary. It's
sufficient to use `...' instead of `..', together with specifying
proper in and out directions to avoid inflections. See attached
patch. However, it doesn't fix the small grazing intersection at the
bulb.
Werner
======================================================================
--- feta-scripts.mf.old 2010-10-17 13:40:03.000000000 +0200
+++ feta-scripts.mf 2010-10-20 09:41:46.000000000 +0200
@@ -1222,15 +1222,15 @@
penstroke z1e
.. z2e
.. z3e
- .. z4e{dir (-loopangle)}
- .. z5e{dir (-loopangle)}
- .. z6e
- .. z7e
- .. z8e
- .. z9e{dir (-loopangle)}
- .. z10e{dir (-loopangle)}
- .. z11e
- .. {dir (180 - loopangle)}z12e;
+ ... {dir (-loopangle)}z4e
+ -- z5e{dir (-loopangle)}
+ ... z6e
+ ... {dir (180 - loopangle)}z7e{dir (180 - loopangle)}
+ ... z8e
+ ... {dir (-loopangle)}z9e
+ -- z10e{dir (-loopangle)}
+ ... z11e
+ ... {dir (180 - loopangle)}z12e;
addto currentpicture also currentpicture scaled -1;
penlabels (1, 1', 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12);
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
