On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote:
> On 10/9/10 9:46 AM, "Mark Polesky" <markpole...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > * * * * * * * * * * > > > > "before-title-spacing" applies to these cases: > > 1) from last system in a score to top-level markup. > > 2) from last system of one score to scoreTitleMarkup of > > another score. > > > > Within the proposed naming scheme, the 2 choices for > > before-title-spacing are: > > system-markup-spacing > > score-markup-spacing > > > > Carl likes "score-markup-spacing" for at least 2 reasons: > > 1) the upper attachment point is always the end of a score. > > 2) "system-markup" suggests that it should work within a > > single score, and it doesn't. > > > > I've gone back and forth, but now I'm in favor of > > "system-markup-spacing" for the following reasons: > > 1) it complements "markup-system-spacing" which is easier > > to remember. > > I don't agree with this rationale. markup-system-spacing is chosen > because the markup can be either inside the score of which the system > is a part Really? How does that happen?
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
