On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 05:29:42PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > "Graham Percival" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:20100922161121.gc14...@futoi... > >NB: I expect approximately 5 more regressions to be reported in > >the next week. Some of them might not be regressions in code that > >worked deliberately. Bug Squad (if you read -devel): add any > >regression as a Critical issue; if a programmer points out that it > >only worked by a fluke in the past and downgrades it to Medium, > >that's totally fine. That's how the system is supposed to work. :) > > I've had a look over the regtest results, and AFAICS there are no > regressions picked up by the regtests. Just a planned change with > multimeasure rests colliding with a clef.
Yes, but as more users start testing 2.13, particularly with their old scores, I expect that they'll be reporting bugs. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
