"Graham Percival" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:20100922161121.gc14...@futoi...
Here's an update on the release plans. These are not cast in
stone; if you have a thoughtful objection or suggestion, I'm
willing to change things.
1) 2.13.34, "alpha test" has been released.
2) website has been switched over. At first glance, I think I can
close issue 1244 now, but I want to double-check and wait for
feedback.
3) after 1244 is done, there's only one remaning Critical issue;
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1173
NB: I expect approximately 5 more regressions to be reported in
the next week. Some of them might not be regressions in code that
worked deliberately. Bug Squad (if you read -devel): add any
regression as a Critical issue; if a programmer points out that it
only worked by a fluke in the past and downgrades it to Medium,
that's totally fine. That's how the system is supposed to work. :)
I've had a look over the regtest results, and AFAICS there are no
regressions picked up by the regtests. Just a planned change with
multimeasure rests colliding with a clef.
Cheers,
- Graham
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
