http://codereview.appspot.com/2226045/diff/3001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2226045/diff/3001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode392 Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely:392: @example Can't this @example be removed, now that there's the @lilypond just below it? http://codereview.appspot.com/2226045/diff/3001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode419 Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely:419: { g'2 } % 6: third-lowest ... if you remove the @example, then I guess technically you should have a: % etc. here. :) http://codereview.appspot.com/2226045/diff/3001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode658 Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely:658: on the staff! I'm ok with this sentence being inside a @warning -- we should only use them rarely, but I think in this case it's a well-deserved @warning. http://codereview.appspot.com/2226045/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
