Reviewers: Trevor Daniels, Message: New patch set uploaded.
On 2010/09/21 07:44:52, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I'm not particularly opposed to placing this in the NR, but it's not clear what you are suggesting here. Do you mean to leave the LM unchanged, or do you intend to remove or change the corresponding section there?
I mean to leave the LM unchanged, for now. Carl has convinced me that the NR is a higher priority for containing this information. We can always add a less comprehensive version to the LM later.
Also, if it is to go in the NR it needs a separate section heading. At the moment it appears under "The double backslash construct", whereas it applies equally to explicitly instantiated voices. Maybe something like "Voice order"?
Done. I also removed some cruft. It looked neat but wasn't necessary. What do you guys think? - Mark Description: Doc: NR 1.5.2: Clarify voice order; \shiftOn etc. In response to: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-09/msg00194.html Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/2226045/ Affected files: M Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
