> Actually I am not sure that 'i.e.,' is necessary. 'i.e,' is not > correct, so 'i.e.' without a comma is fine as far as I know.
Well, `i.e.' is a shorthand for the Latin `id est' which translates to `that is', and for the latter, you always need a comma after the `is' if you continue with a sentence, right? So I think `i.e.' needs a comma. Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel