On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > I'm a bit suspicious about commit > 4578dfbfdab5704ffc5317adfb252cb242f30115 > > 3. I think the previous runtimepath was wrong, but the new one > isn't much better -- it should point to the locally-installed > version of lilypond, which will not necessarily be at /usr/local/ > (for example, I always install it in ~/usr/ )
This commit also removes something I added a while back about the runtime path in Fedora, which is way different than what the docs show for the correct runtime path. Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
