On 7/7/10 7:23 AM, "Carl Sorensen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7/7/10 6:56 AM, "James Lowe" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> What I don't understand is why the middle example shows that the second
>> trill allows for the 'overlap' but the first and third don't and the
>> trills effectively run into each other.
>
> Actually, all 3 work as expected -- the TrillSpanner stops, and a new
> TrillSpanner is created.
On further review, I see that my answer was incorrect. I'm sorry for the
noise.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
