On 7/7/10 6:56 AM, "James Lowe" <james.l...@datacore.com> wrote:
> > What I don't understand is why the middle example shows that the second > trill allows for the 'overlap' but the first and third don't and the > trills effectively run into each other. Actually, all 3 work as expected -- the TrillSpanner stops, and a new TrillSpanner is created. What you have found is that under some conditions there is a collision between consecutive TrillSpanners. I'd suggest that this is a collision bug, rather than a bug with the TrillSpanner stopping. And it's probably caused by the character used to create the spanner having a bounding box slightly smaller than its ink extent, which allows the characters to stack nicely without white space between. (see comment #7 on issue 881 <http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=881> for a description of how this affected arpeggio collisions with ties) HTH, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
