Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com> writes: > Am Mittwoch, 19. Mai 2010, um 11:42:59 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> writes: >> > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:22 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >> Nice touch, but it's not your work going in the bin. >> > >> > Just for the record: I am ok with the current form of the patch. >> >> As you can see by now, that does not change a thing. As long as the >> patch is not in the comfort zone (and that concerns more the patch area >> than its quality by now) of others with commit privileges, nobody is >> going to take the responsibility. > > Can't we finally give commit access to David?
That has been done already recently. It's not likely something that anybody feels particularly happy about, but it seems like the best way to reduce friction between my and others' priorities and thresholds of frustration. On the plus side, should a contributor post regular git patch sets on the developer list, I'd have what it takes to commit/merge them as a regular patch set easily rather than one humongous commit, if consensus can be reached. So maybe the net positive effect might be more than just saving people from some of the uglier outbursts of my frustration. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
