Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> writes: > ideally, this would be broken up in two separate blocks of code, so we > dont have one 70 line block of code, which suggests that something > much more complicated is going on.
There were _37_ lines of code (please don't count comment lines _against_ me) that do a more general job than the _51_ lines of code that are there in the Lilypond repository. In addition, there were 20 lines of comments. The version in the Lilypond repository has no comment in that part. The version which you found fit to continue complaining about without looking at it has boiled this down to 23 lines of code, with 22 comment lines. What are you trying to accomplish with that sort of behavior? Could please somebody else bother to look at this patch set and see whether he finds it particularly hard to understand, in particular in comparison to the code it replaces? The least I can expect after putting in that amount of work is a fair assessment. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
