2010/6/4 Frédéric Bron <frederic.b...@m4x.org> :
> added to issue 1029 and to LSR.
>
> What next can a frog do for this?
Hi (yeah, me again)! :)
I have no authority in development, nor in bug policy, but I have a
proposal about how to handle this issue.
Actually I think we could "divide" this issue into 2 separate ones:
1. short-term fix: change "thumb" definition (avoid-slur . around
+ add other "Fingering" properties that also exists for Script),
but keeping \thumb engraved by "Script_engraver".
Here is what I think could be fine:
("thumb"
. (
(script-stencil . (feta . ("thumb" . "thumb")))
(avoid-slur . around)
(padding . 0.5)
(direction . ,UP)
(slur-padding . 0.2)
(staff-padding . 0.5)))
2. mid(long)-term fix: transfer \thumb to "New_fingering_engraver".
Actually I would rather call that "extending New_fingering_engraver"
It would be also cool to add the possibility for
"New_fingering_engraver" to support _finger changes_, whose
currently suggested input is as a TextScript:
c^\markup { \finger "2 - 3" }
(see NR 1.7.1).
My suggestion is to kindly ask Frédéric to take care of #1, i.e.
changing "thumb" definition in Script, and so close this issue 1029.
And open a new issue "Extend New_fingering_engraver" to also print
\thumb and /custom Fingering markups/ (useful to, for example, finger
changes), see #2.
What do you think guys of this double proposal?
Frédéric, Carl, Bug Squad members?
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer <x.sche...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
