On 6/2/10 3:35 PM, "Frédéric Bron" <frederic.b...@m4x.org> wrote:
> If someone can help me on this, it would be nice.
> Regards, Frédéric
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Comment #3 on issue 1029 by frederic...@m4x.org: \thumb should behave
> like other fingerings
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1029
>
> So I would like to sum up all comments because I am lost on what to change:
>
> Mats suggests this:
> - (avoid-slur . inside)
> - (padding . 0.20)
> + (avoid-slur . around)
> + (padding . 0.50)
>
> Mark asks if we should add others properties from Fingering but
> received no answer:
> (cross-staff . ,ly:side-position-interface::calc-cross-staff)
> (font-encoding . fetaText)
> (font-size . -5) ; don't overlap when next to heads.
> (positioning-done . ,ly:script-interface::calc-positioning-done)
> (script-priority . 100)
> (self-alignment-X . ,CENTER)
> (self-alignment-Y . ,CENTER)
> (slur-padding . 0.2)
> (staff-padding . 0.5)
> (stencil . ,ly:text-interface::print)
> (text . ,fingering::calc-text)
> (meta . ((class . Item)
> (interfaces . (finger-interface
> font-interface
> self-alignment-interface
> side-position-interface
> text-interface
> text-script-interface))))))
>
> Can somebody tell me about that?
I think the answer to the other items is no.
thumb is a Script grob, not its own grob. Fingering is its own grob. So I
think you can't add all of the grob properties to the script alist. All
those other properties are set in the definition of the Script grob, in
scm/define-grobs.scm.
If we want to have \thumb become a Fingering instead of a Script, then we
should change it in the parser to be handled by the New_fingering_engraver.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
