Reinhold Kainhofer <reinhold <at> kainhofer.com> schrieb:
> > If so, I think a new interface,
> > that would simply insert the string into the current stream would make
> > more sense.
>
> Yes, you are probably right. However, I don't know enough of the parser
> internals to implement this myself :(
I've attached a new patch to the issue. It adds a new function,
ly:parser-include-string. This appends the string passed to it right after the
scheme expression the calls appears in. It works like this:
#(ly:parser-include-string parser "{ a b c d }")
As for ly:parser-parse-string and ly:parser-parse-file, I think they should
probably be banned in ly files, since they seem to only cause trouble.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
