Le lundi 01 février 2010 à 17:58 +0100, John Mandereau a écrit : > > Any item which has a match in PROCESSING_INDEPENDENT_OPTIONS is > > supposed to be removed. Unfortunately, the double loop ends up > > removing one match while duplicating seven others (hence why some > > options show eight copies, whereas others have seven). > > > > I attach my first successful attempt at a fix (complete with silly > > debug output and badly placed function def ;) below; > > Thanks, I'm testing, amending and pushing ASAP.
On second thought, I'd prefer a for/else construct, which would avoid creating yet another function. John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
