Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc Hohl wrote Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:04 AM
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc Hohl wrote Monday, January 18, 2010 8:13 PM
Marc Hohl schrieb:
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2010/1/8 Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de>:
Hmmm - you are right. Is it possible to whiteout this small part
of the barlines?
I found out how to define a whiteout stencil, but it seems that it
is placed
*over* the segno sign, ignoring the order I arrange the stencils :-(
You need to manipulate the 'layer property to control which grobs are
whited-out. Have a look at the news for 2.13 for an example of using
the 'whiteout and 'layer properties:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/changes/index
Thanks for the link, but it seems to me that this can be done only as
a scheme override,
not while building up the stencil in bar-line.cc (there's a comment
in tie.cc, line 306-307,
which seems to claim exactly this situation, or am I wrong?).
You're quite right, 'whiteout and 'layer are grob properties so they
apply to all elements of a grob's stencil. I confess I don't know
exactly what you are trying to do here, but I'm not sure whiteout
is a good approach, even if it worked. Can you not draw the bar
line differently for this special case rather than whiting-out parts
of it?
I don't know. The staff lines should end a little bit earlier, see
http://lilypond.googlecode.com/issues/attachment?aid=-394070284723943851&name=segno-end.png&inline=1
I don't think it is a good idea to let the segno sign reach into the
margin, so
the staff lines have to end before reaching the right margin.
Marc
Trevor
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
