On 12/23/09 12:41 AM, "Marc Hohl" <m...@hohlart.de> wrote:
> Carl Sorensen schrieb:
>>
>> On 12/22/09 12:45 AM, "Marc Hohl" <m...@hohlart.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Carl Sorensen schrieb:
>>>
>>>> On 12/21/09 1:52 PM, "Marc Hohl" <m...@hohlart.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I like it much better. But I think that the bulb on the bottom of the
>>>>>> clef
>>>>>> needs to shift slightly to the right with this change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Like the attached one?
>>>>> You may use the pdf file for a printout.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> This may be a bit too much different, or maybe it's just the change in the
>>>> curvature that bothers me a bit. It feels like the curve at the bottom of
>>>> the clef is too pointed somehow. Perhaps it's the transition that I'm
>>>> responding to; I'm not really sure.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Perhaps I overdid it a bit; here is a version where the bulb is exaclty
>>> half-way between
>>> the first and the second attempt.
>>>
>>
>> Looks good to me. I'd also like to see half-way between this attempt and
>> the first attempt, not because I think this is wrong, but because I tend to
>> find optimum settings by finding "not enough" and "too much" and going
>> between those two.
>>
> Here you are!
Having reviewed all four of the clefs, I think I like 3 the best, but I have
a hard time deciding between 3 and 4. Either of them seems fine to me.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
