On 12/22/09 12:45 AM, "Marc Hohl" <m...@hohlart.de> wrote:
> Carl Sorensen schrieb:
>>
>> On 12/21/09 1:52 PM, "Marc Hohl" <m...@hohlart.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> I like it much better. But I think that the bulb on the bottom of the clef
>>>> needs to shift slightly to the right with this change.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Like the attached one?
>>> You may use the pdf file for a printout.
>>>
>>
>> This may be a bit too much different, or maybe it's just the change in the
>> curvature that bothers me a bit. It feels like the curve at the bottom of
>> the clef is too pointed somehow. Perhaps it's the transition that I'm
>> responding to; I'm not really sure.
>>
> Perhaps I overdid it a bit; here is a version where the bulb is exaclty
> half-way between
> the first and the second attempt.
Looks good to me. I'd also like to see half-way between this attempt and
the first attempt, not because I think this is wrong, but because I tend to
find optimum settings by finding "not enough" and "too much" and going
between those two.
But I'm not a great source for making aesthetic decisions. I'm an engineer,
after all!
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
