Reviewers: Neil Puttock,
http://codereview.appspot.com/174080/diff/1003/1004
File lily/tie-performer.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/174080/diff/1003/1004#newcode46
lily/tie-performer.cc:46: // We don't really need a list or deque here.
A vector would suffice. However,
On 2009/12/13 20:04:09, Neil Puttock wrote:
Since the error was caused by a naming conflict for the struct, you
can use a
vector now, though it's less convenient for removing the tied heads.
Exactly, and for that reason, I now prefer a list. In fact, the new
check removed arbitrary elements from the list, which is less efficient
for vectors. Also, splice is not available for vectors, but vector
joining has to be done manually...
http://codereview.appspot.com/174080/diff/1003/1004#newcode133
lily/tie-performer.cc:133: class end_moment_passed
On 2009/12/13 20:04:09, Neil Puttock wrote:
{
protected:
Sigh, About everthing possible is indented with the style, just these
keywords are not :( Not very consistent.
Okay, will change.
Description:
Fix the memory corruption issues I had by renaming the data structure
(shadowing was causing the corruption!).
Also fix the Issue found by Hu Haipeng that a note ending in one voice
would terminate all ongoing ties in all other notes, since so far the
code never checked whether the starting note of the tie was still going
on.
Also, use the correct moment comparison (remove if the end moment is
lower **or equal** to the moment that has just been processed).
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/174080
Affected files:
M lily/tie-performer.cc
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
