Hi Michael, Thanks for your work on this. I think this is excellent architectural support for the future.
On 9/20/09 2:11 PM, "Michael Käppler" <xmichae...@web.de> wrote: > I think what now should be done is to check all assoc-get calls whether > they should use strict_checking or not. > In some cases this can be quite difficult IMHO and it's a far more > time-consuming task than what I've done. Maybe Mark can do this? I think > he digged pretty deep into the scheme code recently. I don't think that it's worth spending time on this. I believe that virtually all of the assoc-get calls as currently written are written to allow defaults without throwing a programming error, and do not need strict_checking. As future developments come, or as people are working on code to improve it, if they want to add strict_checking, that would be fine. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
