2009/9/18 Michael Käppler <xmichae...@web.de>: > Hmm... I forgot that ly:assoc-get throws an assert error instead of > returning #f if it's list argument isn't a list. I reverted this for now, > but maybe we should better output a programming error in assoc-get for this > case?
I don't think that's necessary, since we rely on Guile to catch type-check failures in this case. > Sorry for missing that. However, don't you think that this '=' is > unnecessary? The default comparison procedure is equal? and I don't see any > differences to = that matter for this case. I'm inclined to agree, but `=' isn't as permissive as equal?, so there might be some logic behind it. The revised patch checks out fine, so I've applied it. Thanks, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
