Le samedi 19 septembre 2009 à 07:30 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit : > But we *don't* have "a licensing situation" on a file-by-file > basis. Everything[1] under Documentation/ is FDL; everything > else[2] is GPLv2. > > [1] it would be very useful if somebody could create an example to > replace cary.ly, since that's non-free.
What about keeping Trevor's work under a CC-BY-ND license, in case he agrees with this? If anybody wants to reuse code for any purpose other than quoting the music itself, it will lead to a different enough work so you can consider it can't be a derived work. About other snippets, are you sure there is no other Mutopia snippet in the public domain or under some license other than FDL (say, CC) in the source tree? On the opposite, note that snippets from LSR are public domain, not FDL. > [2] it would be very useful if somebody could identify anything > (other than texinfo.tex and input/* since those are slated for > demolition) that isn't GPLv2. Junking texinfo.tex from our sources is looking for problems: it's better to keep it in our sources, so we can freely update it to latest CVS or keep a not up-to-date revision if we encounter issues with latest CVS. Best, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
