Le jeudi 10 septembre 2009 à 00:24 +0200, Joseph Wakeling a écrit : > But anyway, I'm willing to do the typing side of it. I just need you to > clarify exactly what I should put: presumably GPLv2 for code files and > GFDLv1.1 for docs are the base licenses, but would you and Jan approve > putting GPLv2 or later for your own contributions? What are your > thoughts (and recommendations) for code written by others? I know that > you ran into a paperwork issue some time back that has never been resolved.
For the record, I agree to license/relicense all my code contributions (mostly Python scripts and makefiles) under GPLv2+ or GPLv3+, and dual-license my doc contributions under GFDL1.1+ and GPLv2+. I also hope that I'll junk all dirty scripts I wrote before a copyright header is added to them, but I'm not sure I can achieve this :-) Cheers, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
